DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**TorryJens** · 12-23-2011, 05:32 AM

raghu,

have u seen bhuvana

negative role does not NECESSARILY mean "motta boss" roles or gangster and cheapo villains. Role of avargaL in rajni was a saddistic char. Sivakumar was a selfish char. Negative neverthless. He underplayed his role and definitely convincing. May be since rajni was playing along, sivakumar couldn't shine

somehow "avargaL" is the first movie which I recollect, yeah moondru mudichu was great too. May be I believe real villains are too choclatey and sweet grinning right next to u and doing all possible jobs which motta bosses cannot do

I consider such roles REALISITIC.

ennathu rude aa.... when do I ever take any movie indifferences to heart.
neekku neevu
naaku naanu

raghuvaran...hmm...yes.... baasha was good

12-23-2011, 05:32 AM	#22
TorryJens Join Date Nov 2008 Posts 4,494 Senior Member	raghu, have u seen bhuvana negative role does not NECESSARILY mean "motta boss" roles or gangster and cheapo villains. Role of avargaL in rajni was a saddistic char. Sivakumar was a selfish char. Negative neverthless. He underplayed his role and definitely convincing. May be since rajni was playing along, sivakumar couldn't shine somehow "avargaL" is the first movie which I recollect, yeah moondru mudichu was great too. May be I believe real villains are too choclatey and sweet grinning right next to u and doing all possible jobs which motta bosses cannot do I consider such roles REALISITIC. ennathu rude aa.... when do I ever take any movie indifferences to heart. neekku neevu naaku naanu raghuvaran...hmm...yes.... baasha was good
	Quote