DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post - KamalHassan's post 90's-Comedies

**Lillie_Steins** · 05-05-2009, 06:24 AM

PR, adhaan. What I meant to say was unfunny sequemce-e kidaiyadhu.The thing with the supposedly mokkai climax is that there are no setpieces. Characters are reacting as they would in the situation. The humour lies in our box seat view. My problem, and possibly comfort for someone else, with the subsequent ones are the set pieces. It is still funny but not necessarily in-character. Like I said, it is possivle to buy funny but not natural but that will differ from person to person. But the humour in mmkr is undeniable, and the fact that it is natural is an achievement which I caanot even fathom after the pudding has been eaten. How the hell did they conceive that pudding?

05-05-2009, 06:24 AM	#32
Lillie_Steins Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 4,508 Senior Member	PR, adhaan. What I meant to say was unfunny sequemce-e kidaiyadhu.The thing with the supposedly mokkai climax is that there are no setpieces. Characters are reacting as they would in the situation. The humour lies in our box seat view. My problem, and possibly comfort for someone else, with the subsequent ones are the set pieces. It is still funny but not necessarily in-character. Like I said, it is possivle to buy funny but not natural but that will differ from person to person. But the humour in mmkr is undeniable, and the fact that it is natural is an achievement which I caanot even fathom after the pudding has been eaten. How the hell did they conceive that pudding?
	Quote