DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**Paul Bunyan** · 08-31-2009, 11:59 PM

Originally Posted by Sarna but Ayan is complete entertainer unlike padikkaadhavan... that is my point. I didnt mean to say that if Sun pictures produced, then the movie is sure blockbuster.... but if the movie is entertaining (or good) , then the publicity adds advantage. Polladhavan didnt have that advantage

i do assume u meant polladhavan in bold there.......ok, do u agree that padikkadhavan had that advantage of being complete masala and was produced by sun pictures and had same amount of publicity that AYan got??? in such equal scenario too , BO success of Ayan> BO success of padikkadhavan..... I meant Padikkaadhavan only

08-31-2009, 11:59 PM	#39
Paul Bunyan Join Date Jul 2007 Age 58 Posts 4,495 Senior Member	Originally Posted by Sarna but Ayan is complete entertainer unlike padikkaadhavan... that is my point. I didnt mean to say that if Sun pictures produced, then the movie is sure blockbuster.... but if the movie is entertaining (or good) , then the publicity adds advantage. Polladhavan didnt have that advantage i do assume u meant polladhavan in bold there.......ok, do u agree that padikkadhavan had that advantage of being complete masala and was produced by sun pictures and had same amount of publicity that AYan got??? in such equal scenario too , BO success of Ayan> BO success of padikkadhavan..... I meant Padikkaadhavan only
	Quote