DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post - Kamal

**brraverishhh** · 05-24-2008, 07:31 AM

The predominant intention in the article is to take ingenuine potshots at Kamal the actor which is ofcourse the complaint of us. Adhu eppadi unga kannukku mattum theriyama pochunnu engalukku theriala

Adhu seri neenga eppadi padikanumnu naanga ungalukku advise pannaleeyae. Why dont u follow the same :P

Originally Posted by Prabhu Ram Originally Posted by rajasaranam Originally Posted by Prabhu Ram [tscii] But the real gift was the final slide of the opening titles that gave the hitherto “interfering actor” the credit for the creatives."

What the hell is that supposed to mean ? Nejamave pruiyalayaa illa Baekku mathiri Nadikreengala

Kamal dhaan nadikkalai-nnu solrAngaLE...nammaLAvadhu muyarci seyyalAmEnnu dhaan.

The last slide in the opening credits have ezhuthi iyakkavar: kamal Haasan. Which is what he is referring to. I was annoyed with the term "interfering actor". For heaven sake, this chap was dropping the name Mel Gibson a few paragraphs ago.

After the fatuous name dropping, pretentious insights and the oh-so-clever-title, he finds fault with narcissism.

Hayyo hayyo. Varikku vari padichu lets not discuss over the article. The essence of the Article as I perceive is that the author wants the Creator Kamal to be unleashed from the bounds of Actor Kamal.
Your POV may be that he had some malicious intent in writing that article defaming Kamal.

Article Padicha Anubavikkannum Aarayaa koodathu

05-24-2008, 07:31 AM	#34
brraverishhh Join Date Jan 2006 Posts 5,127 Senior Member	The predominant intention in the article is to take ingenuine potshots at Kamal the actor which is ofcourse the complaint of us. Adhu eppadi unga kannukku mattum theriyama pochunnu engalukku theriala Adhu seri neenga eppadi padikanumnu naanga ungalukku advise pannaleeyae. Why dont u follow the same :P Originally Posted by Prabhu Ram Originally Posted by rajasaranam Originally Posted by Prabhu Ram [tscii] But the real gift was the final slide of the opening titles that gave the hitherto “interfering actor” the credit for the creatives." What the hell is that supposed to mean ? Nejamave pruiyalayaa illa Baekku mathiri Nadikreengala Kamal dhaan nadikkalai-nnu solrAngaLE...nammaLAvadhu muyarci seyyalAmEnnu dhaan. The last slide in the opening credits have ezhuthi iyakkavar: kamal Haasan. Which is what he is referring to. I was annoyed with the term "interfering actor". For heaven sake, this chap was dropping the name Mel Gibson a few paragraphs ago. After the fatuous name dropping, pretentious insights and the oh-so-clever-title, he finds fault with narcissism. Hayyo hayyo. Varikku vari padichu lets not discuss over the article. The essence of the Article as I perceive is that the author wants the Creator Kamal to be unleashed from the bounds of Actor Kamal. Your POV may be that he had some malicious intent in writing that article defaming Kamal. Article Padicha Anubavikkannum Aarayaa koodathu
	Quote