DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**Big A** · 05-19-2007, 06:28 AM

nakeeran,

parthirukken....

I just felt, kamalhassan is more apt.

If I say, rajnikant, portrays frustration better than kamalhassan, it does not mean KAMALHASSAN cant portray such emotion.

Its just I ENJOY RAJNIKANT's portrayal of sadness or frustration better than kamalhassan.

thats all.

Talking a bout elegance or upper class mannerisms, I like kamalhassan's portrayal better than rajnikant.

mmkr... madhan role onnu pothum.....

phew... such perfect pronunciation... rich creamy look/style/mannerisms.

opinions differ

05-19-2007, 06:28 AM	#32
Big A Join Date Oct 2005 Age 50 Posts 4,148 Administrator	nakeeran, parthirukken.... I just felt, kamalhassan is more apt. If I say, rajnikant, portrays frustration better than kamalhassan, it does not mean KAMALHASSAN cant portray such emotion. Its just I ENJOY RAJNIKANT's portrayal of sadness or frustration better than kamalhassan. thats all. Talking a bout elegance or upper class mannerisms, I like kamalhassan's portrayal better than rajnikant. mmkr... madhan role onnu pothum..... phew... such perfect pronunciation... rich creamy look/style/mannerisms. opinions differ
	Quote