DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**softy54534** · 01-19-2007, 10:57 PM

Originally Posted by groucho070 Ellarume thirudanggattan. There is a thin blur line between getting inspired and copying.

like "pudhiya paravai" uruvified from "following the crooked shadow"?

if uruvified why does times magazine recognise nayagan?...

if u say inspiration and copying has thin line..."pather panchali" is inspired from a western drama....is sathyajitray a thirudan

sorry to say this Vikki. But I think u mistunderstood what "groucho" said. He said there is only minimal difference between getting inspired and copying.

He didn't refer to anyone in particular. He referred to the word "Inspiration " being used by many to hide their copying, I think.

btw, Only Nayagan got recognition in the magazine. Right ? I have nothing against this as long as it enriches tamil cinema.

But anyway mistake is a mistake. Be it inspiration or copying.

01-19-2007, 10:57 PM	#13
softy54534 Join Date Apr 2007 Posts 5,457 Senior Member	Originally Posted by groucho070 Ellarume thirudanggattan. There is a thin blur line between getting inspired and copying. like "pudhiya paravai" uruvified from "following the crooked shadow"? if uruvified why does times magazine recognise nayagan?... if u say inspiration and copying has thin line..."pather panchali" is inspired from a western drama....is sathyajitray a thirudan sorry to say this Vikki. But I think u mistunderstood what "groucho" said. He said there is only minimal difference between getting inspired and copying. He didn't refer to anyone in particular. He referred to the word "Inspiration " being used by many to hide their copying, I think. btw, Only Nayagan got recognition in the magazine. Right ? I have nothing against this as long as it enriches tamil cinema. But anyway mistake is a mistake. Be it inspiration or copying.
	Quote