[brraverishhh]

It is not clear from the post what the argument is. If it about the mis use of good intentions, I am with the author. But you need to more specific about what the mis use. For e.g., it is clear in the case of Kingfisher Airlines that any bail out by the Govt is a misplaced sympathy. That might not be the case in the textile industry. There are a lot of people who only know about making business and livelihood through Textile business. They might have genuinely invested and lost. As I have said before, a social setup cannot be seen the same way as an economic set up. Every one is not born with intelligence and talent. They need to be allowed to survive and if such people have failed, they need to be helped to revive.
Which of these is genuine and which isnt (like the KingFisher Airlines), I cannot say. But that does not mean the social concept of helping the failed is flawed. In another thread, we remember discussing that the really intelligent is the one who makes money and its the money that counts, not intelligence. Then why cry over lack of intelligence here?

Is your argument that the value of money one has earned, has been diminshed by the (you say easy) offer made to the other? You would rather see him starve and die, so you feel the money earned by the other was well earned?
I fail to understand what you are trying to convey.