DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post - Cry the beloved country-may, 2012.

**9mm_fan** · 06-02-2012, 12:59 AM

It is not clear from the post what the argument is.

Is your argument that the value of money one has earned, has been diminshed by the (you say easy) offer made to the other? You would rather see him starve and die, so you feel the money earned by the other was well earned?
I fail to understand what you are trying to convey.

Mr. O3, (beautiful post)
That is a powerful argument, and you are absolutely right. There are no level fields in this universe. The rich are rich because they took advantage of the prevailing circumstances. For Instance Hindustan Motors, or Leyland motors flourished because the government gave them protection in India, even though their parent companies died. So you can say that HM's wealth is all because of good management. So if a company is doing good socially they need some financial assistance, government should help, but it should be done like a loan. In US the massive bailout to AIG, or GM paid back handsomely. So the bailout saved the jobs and government got its money + interest.

If one wants the government to be totally ruthless, why do we need government. These people who claim they do not want government do not know what they are asking for. It will be like returning to good old days of lawless west. The mighty will rule and others will be mere servants.

06-02-2012, 12:59 AM	#9
9mm_fan Join Date May 2007 Age 53 Posts 5,191 Senior Member	It is not clear from the post what the argument is. Is your argument that the value of money one has earned, has been diminshed by the (you say easy) offer made to the other? You would rather see him starve and die, so you feel the money earned by the other was well earned? I fail to understand what you are trying to convey. Mr. O3, (beautiful post) That is a powerful argument, and you are absolutely right. There are no level fields in this universe. The rich are rich because they took advantage of the prevailing circumstances. For Instance Hindustan Motors, or Leyland motors flourished because the government gave them protection in India, even though their parent companies died. So you can say that HM's wealth is all because of good management. So if a company is doing good socially they need some financial assistance, government should help, but it should be done like a loan. In US the massive bailout to AIG, or GM paid back handsomely. So the bailout saved the jobs and government got its money + interest. If one wants the government to be totally ruthless, why do we need government. These people who claim they do not want government do not know what they are asking for. It will be like returning to good old days of lawless west. The mighty will rule and others will be mere servants.
	Quote