DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**NeroASERCH** · 05-25-2012, 11:04 AM

There is absolutely no comparison between those two. Comparing a hill to the Himalayas. At the hill level, you would be competing with him in stature unless you wean away from obsessing about Mr.Shankar and his idiosyncracies.

You haven’t read the reports about how the TSA (Transport Security Agency) in USA treated Edward Kennedy or Henry Kissinger or Al Gore ( just to name a few of the “revered” leaders of America) at the airport security check point. In America there is no sacred cow, they don’t “revere” their leaders. They also don’t believe that a revered leader’s family should have a perpetual hold or eternal proprietary entitlement to leadership. Selfless service from Nehru and Indira Gandhi, yes agreed, but that kind of selflessness is not a genetic trait that gets passed on within the same family from generation to generation for eternity, to give rise to a virtual super-super-caste of one and the same family

I think this is probably the message your “Mr. Shankar” is trying to get across, albeit in an uncouth, unrefined way. Nevertheless, it does not hurt to offer him the courtesy of being addressed as “Sir” or “Ji” . That is what we in India do.

Mr. Naina sirji,
I was very polite and addressed him as Mr. Shankar.
When I was taking of reverence in America, I was talking of George Washington, not the political leader of the day.
Mr. Shankar maharaji sir his holiness 108 is basically ranting about same old drudged and trumped up charges. I concede that this is his post and he has absolutely every right to say what ever he wants to say. I am more concerned where he steals the post and rants totally nonsense unrelated to the post.

I have no argument with you.

05-25-2012, 11:04 AM	#23
NeroASERCH Join Date Jul 2006 Posts 5,147 Senior Member	There is absolutely no comparison between those two. Comparing a hill to the Himalayas. At the hill level, you would be competing with him in stature unless you wean away from obsessing about Mr.Shankar and his idiosyncracies. You haven’t read the reports about how the TSA (Transport Security Agency) in USA treated Edward Kennedy or Henry Kissinger or Al Gore ( just to name a few of the “revered” leaders of America) at the airport security check point. In America there is no sacred cow, they don’t “revere” their leaders. They also don’t believe that a revered leader’s family should have a perpetual hold or eternal proprietary entitlement to leadership. Selfless service from Nehru and Indira Gandhi, yes agreed, but that kind of selflessness is not a genetic trait that gets passed on within the same family from generation to generation for eternity, to give rise to a virtual super-super-caste of one and the same family I think this is probably the message your “Mr. Shankar” is trying to get across, albeit in an uncouth, unrefined way. Nevertheless, it does not hurt to offer him the courtesy of being addressed as “Sir” or “Ji” . That is what we in India do. Mr. Naina sirji, I was very polite and addressed him as Mr. Shankar. When I was taking of reverence in America, I was talking of George Washington, not the political leader of the day. Mr. Shankar maharaji sir his holiness 108 is basically ranting about same old drudged and trumped up charges. I concede that this is his post and he has absolutely every right to say what ever he wants to say. I am more concerned where he steals the post and rants totally nonsense unrelated to the post. I have no argument with you.
	Quote