I had also raised this question before, in addition to pointing out that issues concerning immigration policies and tax breaks are 'rational' issues and not 'emotional' at all. Jaykay has formed an opinion on Obama's performance and has concluded that he does not deserve to be re-elected. He has arrived at these conclusions rationally, of which there can hardly be any doubt. Where he seems to err is he believes that because his conclusion is arrived at rationally, coming to a contrarian conclusion is irrational. It is a fallacy.