View Single Post
Old 04-15-2012, 08:34 AM   #3
softy54534

Join Date
Apr 2007
Posts
5,457
Senior Member
Default
Dear Sri Jaykay767 Ji,

I appreciate all your inferences above.

It would be nice if you cite any scholarly sources to establish all your claims.

You know, these claims are opposite to and negates all these years of painstaking scholarly research done not only by Indian historians as well as others.

Regards,
KRS
Dear KRS,

All of them are based on facts. South Indian temple inscription (do a google search, you will find it), Megasthenes Indica, South Indian cities, Hills, - all named by Govt of India, Govt of India says "Jain texts written 1000s of years back says Ramayana is a story of 2 dravidian chieftains."

if Ramyana is a story of 2 dravidian chieftains, then how can Rama come from North India ??

Kannada (maurya & Guptas) & Telugu Kings establish kingdowms in North India - are all factual history as written by Govt of India.

The only inference I am making is that Bharatvarshe is the land from Vindyas (Himalayas) to Kerala. why ?. if Sanjeevini Hills are in Andhra, then how can Himalayas be the current "Ice clad mountain" ?????? It has to be the Vindyas.

Cauvery is Ganga is written all over. Gangavath is in karnataka & Coorgis call them as Ganga !!

Btn, there is a Ganga in Thailand as well

Cheers,
JK
softy54534 is offline


 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:47 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity