DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**doctorzlo** · 06-13-2012, 12:49 AM

Dear Sri. Prasad, Greetings.

I have no intention of answering for Sri. Sarang. He would be quite capable of it himself.

But, I like to mention my opinions in this subject, please. India is not a secular country. It is only a lip service. She calls herself secular while she is far from being secular. Secular does not mean minority population gets adavantages at the expense of majority population; but that is exactly what happens in India at all levels.

If someone is donating money, it is the courtsy for the person collecting the donation to make the amount accountable.

There are countries governed fair and equitably. For example, I live in one such country. No, sir, India is not a secular country.

Cheers!

I have no argument with your statement, on the contrary I agree with you. The implementation has gone wrong because of the vote bank politics. I am against quota of any sort. I am not condoning the government for mollycoddling of minorities (muslims). But do I hold the community responsible for the crimes of the government?
That is why I wrote against Mr. Sudheswer's comment, which is against a community in general. I know he had a muslim friend. It used to said in the old west of America, that "the good Indian is the dead Indian".
India is never going to be a Hindu nation, so no point in marginalizing an entire community. It needs to be balanced goes without saying. Unfortunately policies differ from practice.

I see I am antagonizing my friends, but I am not that far from their views. It is just that it looks bad to bash your own countrymen in public site.

06-13-2012, 12:49 AM	#27
doctorzlo Join Date Jun 2006 Posts 4,488 Senior Member	Dear Sri. Prasad, Greetings. I have no intention of answering for Sri. Sarang. He would be quite capable of it himself. But, I like to mention my opinions in this subject, please. India is not a secular country. It is only a lip service. She calls herself secular while she is far from being secular. Secular does not mean minority population gets adavantages at the expense of majority population; but that is exactly what happens in India at all levels. If someone is donating money, it is the courtsy for the person collecting the donation to make the amount accountable. There are countries governed fair and equitably. For example, I live in one such country. No, sir, India is not a secular country. Cheers! I have no argument with your statement, on the contrary I agree with you. The implementation has gone wrong because of the vote bank politics. I am against quota of any sort. I am not condoning the government for mollycoddling of minorities (muslims). But do I hold the community responsible for the crimes of the government? That is why I wrote against Mr. Sudheswer's comment, which is against a community in general. I know he had a muslim friend. It used to said in the old west of America, that "the good Indian is the dead Indian". India is never going to be a Hindu nation, so no point in marginalizing an entire community. It needs to be balanced goes without saying. Unfortunately policies differ from practice. I see I am antagonizing my friends, but I am not that far from their views. It is just that it looks bad to bash your own countrymen in public site.
	Quote