DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post - Evolution of Saivaism and it's development in Tamil Nadu

**Paul Bunyan** · 11-09-2005, 07:40 AM

[quote="Uppuma"]Friends,
I quote back my original from Paripadal-

Aathi anthanan Arinthu pariKoluva
VETHA Mapun Vaiyather Vurnthu
Naga Nana Malai Villaga
Muvagai Areil Orazhal Ambin Muliya
Mathira Mazhalveithu Amarar Velvi
Bagam Vunda PAingat Parppan 5:22-27KaduvaliVeiinar Before you start your round-the-bush-beating, Mr Uppuma (solomon), you should first post some details of the poet - when did he live? I have said many times that the Sangam period overlapped the bakti (a far as the Sangam Literatures are dated). Now would you please give a date for the poet, Mr KaduvaliVeiinar.

Natpe- We have MR.Idiyappam who always mistreats and misinterprets Tamil Literaure and its contact with Sanskrit Vedas- which are root of Indian Civilisation. Indian Vedic- Indic. Root of Indian civilisation???? Then what happened???

Now let us see Aathi Anthanan; translate it it is First Brahmin, and I on the Basis of Vedic Tradtion called it Brahma.
Amarar Bagam Vunda Paingat Parppan- Brahmin who eats Devas Yagna part, and I translated it as Siva. Great - though your translation is wrong and grossly misleading!

A poet sitting down there, looking are the Parppans (Brahmins, as you say) eating Devas roasted in their Yagna Fire, writes the story. So??? So what now?

The name Siva, Vishnu, and if my rememberance is riight - the very names does not occur once even in Sangam Lit. Your 'rememberance' is ok you think?? Take a look again!

Now Idiayppam has no problem in applying to Brahma and Siva, but when Veda is referred he Comes with Meaningless Postings. I don't understand. Applying what to Brahma and Siva? Nilagiri Thailam? Siva have rheumatic problems? Or Brahma?

Mr.Idiyappam has been answered several times by PAVANAR and other Quotes, but he spoils each thread, I request Moderators should look. Yes, and Mr Idiyappam always catches all the flaws in your proofs.

11-09-2005, 07:40 AM	#24
Paul Bunyan Join Date Jul 2007 Age 58 Posts 4,495 Senior Member	[quote="Uppuma"]Friends, I quote back my original from Paripadal- Aathi anthanan Arinthu pariKoluva VETHA Mapun Vaiyather Vurnthu Naga Nana Malai Villaga Muvagai Areil Orazhal Ambin Muliya Mathira Mazhalveithu Amarar Velvi Bagam Vunda PAingat Parppan 5:22-27KaduvaliVeiinar Before you start your round-the-bush-beating, Mr Uppuma (solomon), you should first post some details of the poet - when did he live? I have said many times that the Sangam period overlapped the bakti (a far as the Sangam Literatures are dated). Now would you please give a date for the poet, Mr KaduvaliVeiinar. Natpe- We have MR.Idiyappam who always mistreats and misinterprets Tamil Literaure and its contact with Sanskrit Vedas- which are root of Indian Civilisation. Indian Vedic- Indic. Root of Indian civilisation???? Then what happened??? Now let us see Aathi Anthanan; translate it it is First Brahmin, and I on the Basis of Vedic Tradtion called it Brahma. Amarar Bagam Vunda Paingat Parppan- Brahmin who eats Devas Yagna part, and I translated it as Siva. Great - though your translation is wrong and grossly misleading! A poet sitting down there, looking are the Parppans (Brahmins, as you say) eating Devas roasted in their Yagna Fire, writes the story. So??? So what now? The name Siva, Vishnu, and if my rememberance is riight - the very names does not occur once even in Sangam Lit. Your 'rememberance' is ok you think?? Take a look again! Now Idiayppam has no problem in applying to Brahma and Siva, but when Veda is referred he Comes with Meaningless Postings. I don't understand. Applying what to Brahma and Siva? Nilagiri Thailam? Siva have rheumatic problems? Or Brahma? Mr.Idiyappam has been answered several times by PAVANAR and other Quotes, but he spoils each thread, I request Moderators should look. Yes, and Mr Idiyappam always catches all the flaws in your proofs.
	Quote