I insist our friends to look into the core meaning of message that Mr. Kaarthikaippoo wants to convey. I sum up here his main issues. 1.If worship can be done in tamil (since tamil has organized poetries like Thevaaram & Thiruvasakam) why is not followed in tamil atleast in TamilNadu? 2.Why has in boards of temples of tamilNadu, it been written as "Thamizilum" with "um" which conveys secondary preference for tamil? Is tamil considered as "Neesa Basha" & Sanskrit considered as Deva Basha even now? 3.If all devotees of Hindus (not Inthus) like only "Sanskrit Manthras" why are all caste people not allowed to practice "Archaka" in temples? 4.When Dr.Karunanidhi & Dr. Jayalalitha tried to make this "vedhic hymns" open for masses through Vedhakama Schools why has it been stayed in supreme court? 5.Why is, the objectionable portions of Manusmirthi & Bhagavatgita which legitimizes that only "Brahmins"(BY BIRTH) can learn Vedhic hymns & do poojaas which was also taken as proofs by Supreme courts to stay / prevent masses learning Sanskrit, still followed eventhough all people cry for caste elimination? 6.This means Caste discrimination is still followed in India. Is it not? 7.Muslims sings some Arabic hymns. Christians sings some English/Latin hymns. Likewise, Hindus sings Sanskrit hymns. Okay! Acceptable! But in all religions, with all credentials anyone can become priest Is anybody who knows all Sanskrit Manthraas irrespective of castes, with all credentials can become priest in Hindus (not in Inthus). Is it a great discrepancy / discrimination against humanity Why shall not humanity lovers Viz. all kind of religious believers / Non believers talk about this- including Atheists 8.It means all humanity lovers can talk about this issue. Is is not? 9.Language of worship is not a problem. Discrimination of language in worship is a problem due to its humanity proportions. Let us love humanity