DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**tgs** · 03-31-2007, 03:48 AM

Dear Friends,

It is surpriseing that Fsg/Bismala support carrying Caste surname and claiming proud of it.

Surnames have nothing to do with caste. Do not look at things wearing your "caste spectacles".

Every person who knows history know that the Dalits were all troubled by Upper caste non brahmins and the surname referred is one such.

Dalits can have their own surnames. Nobody prevented them. The surnames of others cannot in anyway harm the Dalits.

In Madurai, Dalits were not allowed to participate in elections with these false prides.

Where and how did you come to know this? Please give us the website from which you came to know it. I do not believe any Dalit was prevented because he did not reflect a surname.

Vedas do not have castes, where as Sangam Lit(200BCE-200ce) and Thol100-200CE has it. Dravidians are the outsiders who came to India from Outside.

Your datelines are erroneous. Tolkappiyam ( >1500BCE) has no caste. There were professions. Sangam Lit show no caste too.
If Dr came from outside, who were the ones present here? The Dalits?
Is that why they are called Adi Dravidas?

Vedas are highly reverred in Sangam and Tholappiyam.

Sangam and Tol referred to Tamiz Vedas. The Arya Vedas are later copied from Tamiz Vedas.

Thanks FSG for your illuminating posts 'where everything is proved' and pavitra and uppuma keep bluffing endlessly.

03-31-2007, 03:48 AM	#28
tgs Join Date Mar 2007 Age 48 Posts 5,125 Senior Member	Dear Friends, It is surpriseing that Fsg/Bismala support carrying Caste surname and claiming proud of it. Surnames have nothing to do with caste. Do not look at things wearing your "caste spectacles". Every person who knows history know that the Dalits were all troubled by Upper caste non brahmins and the surname referred is one such. Dalits can have their own surnames. Nobody prevented them. The surnames of others cannot in anyway harm the Dalits. In Madurai, Dalits were not allowed to participate in elections with these false prides. Where and how did you come to know this? Please give us the website from which you came to know it. I do not believe any Dalit was prevented because he did not reflect a surname. Vedas do not have castes, where as Sangam Lit(200BCE-200ce) and Thol100-200CE has it. Dravidians are the outsiders who came to India from Outside. Your datelines are erroneous. Tolkappiyam ( >1500BCE) has no caste. There were professions. Sangam Lit show no caste too. If Dr came from outside, who were the ones present here? The Dalits? Is that why they are called Adi Dravidas? Vedas are highly reverred in Sangam and Tholappiyam. Sangam and Tol referred to Tamiz Vedas. The Arya Vedas are later copied from Tamiz Vedas. Thanks FSG for your illuminating posts 'where everything is proved' and pavitra and uppuma keep bluffing endlessly.
	Quote