DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**Beerinkol** · 06-28-2006, 03:16 AM

Dear Friends,

Can bismala get those Myth- Tamil Vedas?
Has it eaten?
where is it?

Why Every Authority agrees that what is referred is Sanskrit Vedas

Where as Thani- Tamil Scholars went on to go by the Jainistic Probaganda- that Silapathikaram and Kural are Jainistic, with very flimsy few picked verses. Even few went on to say that Marai or Vetham or Ooththu in Tholkappiyam, Sangam-Kural – Manimekhalai could be some Non Existent Tamil Vedams etc., and The Missionary Motived Pavanar had to himself has to admit-
// " Nalvetham or Nanmarai, Arangam Agamam enbana ellam Arya Noolkale enbathum, Thirukural thavira ippothulla Pandai Noolkalellam Anthanar enbathum Brahmararie Kurikkum Enpathu Sariye. Page- 102 Tamilar Matham.//

Devapriya.

You are saying that PaavaaNar was motivated by missionary men and yet you are citing his conclusion to support you. He was missionary-motivated so was he also so motivated into saying that anthaNar meant BrahmaNa etc., ? Or are you saying that he spoke what is acceptable to you even though he was so motivated and did not lose his balance? You need to clarify the contradictory stances you are taking Devapriya!

06-28-2006, 03:16 AM	#35
Beerinkol Join Date Dec 2006 Posts 5,268 Senior Member	Dear Friends, Can bismala get those Myth- Tamil Vedas? Has it eaten? where is it? Why Every Authority agrees that what is referred is Sanskrit Vedas Where as Thani- Tamil Scholars went on to go by the Jainistic Probaganda- that Silapathikaram and Kural are Jainistic, with very flimsy few picked verses. Even few went on to say that Marai or Vetham or Ooththu in Tholkappiyam, Sangam-Kural – Manimekhalai could be some Non Existent Tamil Vedams etc., and The Missionary Motived Pavanar had to himself has to admit- // " Nalvetham or Nanmarai, Arangam Agamam enbana ellam Arya Noolkale enbathum, Thirukural thavira ippothulla Pandai Noolkalellam Anthanar enbathum Brahmararie Kurikkum Enpathu Sariye. Page- 102 Tamilar Matham.// Devapriya. You are saying that PaavaaNar was motivated by missionary men and yet you are citing his conclusion to support you. He was missionary-motivated so was he also so motivated into saying that anthaNar meant BrahmaNa etc., ? Or are you saying that he spoke what is acceptable to you even though he was so motivated and did not lose his balance? You need to clarify the contradictory stances you are taking Devapriya!
	Quote