[Beerinkol]

"Indian astrology is based on the time of birth more than the day of birth (western astrology) and so it makes a huge difference. This is why the study could not conclude well, because diffeent time makes vast differences."

The study didn't conclude well because astrology simply doesn't work! Furthermore, if the study "didn't conclude well", then WHY did you post a link to the article here, as IF the study had a pro-astrology result?! Basically what you were saying is "hey! come check out this study that proves astrology!" until i said "did you even read the study?! it actually PROVES astrology doesn't work!" and now you're saying "oh... it didn't work because it's not indian astrology!" Come on! you're waffling and not making sense.

Also, you said "i met a great person who was an astrologer... he says it's a perfect science" If that were true, EVERY SINGLE astrologer would be able to not only obtain PERFECT results every time, but ALL astrologers would obtain the EXACT same results! See how ridiculous it's sounding?!

Finally, your statement about the Grand Canyon still doesn't make sense.

you also said "All these shows that Vedic system was wide spread throughout the world, when all continents were all connected."

The last time India was connected to the United States was approximately 60-90 MILLION years ago. The Vedic system is only a few thousand years old. Furthermore, the constellations aren't ANYWHERE near where/what they are today. Please see: tinyurl.com/rr9jf

Thanks for listening.,
LH