DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**9mm_fan** · 04-12-2006, 04:12 AM

Even for a marriage of convenience there must be something common. Hinduism and Sanskrit serves the purpose. Well. "Hinduism" and "Sanskrit" have been there for many centuries even before the British came; yet, these factors (if they can be ranked as "factors") failed to induce the various rulers there to form themselves into single political entity.

Hence, they cannot be counted now as "factors" holding India together!!

If they can be the uniting factors, they would have achieved that outcome long before the British came.

If Sans is a uniting factor , then Sinhalese (claimed as Sans-derived) people should have also been in the Indian Union. They did not even want to claim or preserve affinity with India even though India was the birthplace of Buddha.

Sans - Hindus but they do not even want to share river waters. Why?

04-12-2006, 04:12 AM	#35
9mm_fan Join Date May 2007 Age 53 Posts 5,191 Senior Member	Even for a marriage of convenience there must be something common. Hinduism and Sanskrit serves the purpose. Well. "Hinduism" and "Sanskrit" have been there for many centuries even before the British came; yet, these factors (if they can be ranked as "factors") failed to induce the various rulers there to form themselves into single political entity. Hence, they cannot be counted now as "factors" holding India together!! If they can be the uniting factors, they would have achieved that outcome long before the British came. If Sans is a uniting factor , then Sinhalese (claimed as Sans-derived) people should have also been in the Indian Union. They did not even want to claim or preserve affinity with India even though India was the birthplace of Buddha. Sans - Hindus but they do not even want to share river waters. Why?
	Quote