[softy54534]

Dear Thiru Senthilkumaras,

You wrote

// why do the historians donot accept the documented dates of events in our ancient Tamizh works.
Are we not doing enough popularizing like our ANorth Indian counterparts //

We have enough popularised our works.

But all historians are north Indian oriented. Few south indians historians are who are also sanskrit oriented. Tamil oriented historians are less in India. This is bitter but truth.

You talked about Greece,Romans and Singalas. They have their own nations. Wheareas tamils dont have nation but have taken India/Malaysia/Singapore as nation or atleast in citizenship.

Perhaps If tamils some 100 years back accepted Hindhi / Hindhustani, left their own language tamil in education and other spheres, never tried to legitimise their originality and turned into some language like telugu and kananada the so called north Indian historians would have accepted and familiarise the tamils history spread stories that tamils were the foremost race of indians history.

The confusion could have been rejected in their mind.

Some of the historians are accepting the truth in the sense that there is some proto-dravidian / Archaic tamil / you give a name other than tamil.

The best way to make all indian historians accepting tamil heriditary is to tell them there is no tamil anywhere in india / world.

Is this possible ? Think it over.

f.s.gandhi