DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post - Historians' TIMELINE of ancient Tamil Kings of Sangam works

**tgs** · 12-17-2005, 02:07 AM

Friends,

I have quoted from the book authored by V.P.PURUSHOTHAM- Sanga Kala Mannargal Nilai Varalaru, which has also a foreword by Director of International Tamil Studies and ThaniTamil movement Scholor Mr.SalaIlanthiraiyan.

Silapathikaram Line tells Kumari Kodu, does not means Kandam, and moreover Satelite Pictures do not support any Below SEA land mass Between Indian Ocean to Pacific.

Pavanar Schools Mr.Kodumudi Shanmugam in his Recent book completely Disowns Kumari Kandam Fables siting the above and the CENTENARY Meeting in Honour of Pavanr in Chennai University.

MosesSolomon

sorry sirs,

a foreword by the director of tanithamizh movement---------------any politician never ever did any grasp on LANGUAGE , CLASSICAL that is , and CIVILIZATION(everybody will agree sure on civilization and politician Iam sure)

AND heard of the ATLANTIS- go to http://www.atlan.org/book/ please see it for yourselvesLOST CONTINENT ? FOR A LONG time until ARCHAEOLOGY and OCEANOLOGY took the subject everybody thought it was A MYTH, BUT NO , THERE WAS ATLANTIS scientists say now!!!!!
as the wise old king said(solomon) there is no satellite pictures or physical underwater Reef or Ridges yet of the submerged Atlantis!!
YET OCEAN ARCHAEOLOGY reveals possibilities of a submerged land mass in the Atlantic ocean.
THAT IS BECAUSE THE EARTH'S CRUST MOVES A LOT IN 1000'S OF YEARS; AND SIMILARLY NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ARCHAEOLOGY also AGREES to the history of KUMARI CONTINENT -ALONG with existence of the city of DWARAKA that LORD KRISHNA BUILT FOR HIS PEOPLE and that a bigger city of MAHABALIPURAM AND POOMPUGAAR AS PROVED BY THE EXPEDITIONS OF SIR GRAHAM HANCOCK AND THE ROYAL BRITISH DEPARTMENT OF ARCHAEOLOGY(visit Graham Hancock Ocean archaeology websites)
By the by have you read the North Indian Historians giving proof on the TIMELINE OF LORD KRISHNA IN THE YEAR 4,100 B.C.E. AND THEIR EARLIEST SANSKRIT WORK BASED ON THE POSITION OF STARS AND CONSTELLATIONS IN THAT PERIOD TO ABOUT 8,000 B.C.E.
BASED ON THE SAME CALCULATIONS THEY HAVE ALSO DERIVED THE TIMELINE OF TAMIL WORKS TO 65OO B.C.E.
(read it in my previous links on these calculations).
According to those SENIOR North Indian Historians these are scientific facts that holds good.

WHEN SCIENCE SAYS IT YOU SHOULD BE BRAVE ENOUGH TO ACCEPT THAT THE EARLIEST TAMIZH AND SANSKRIT WORKS DATE AROUND 6500 TO 8,000 B.C.E.

12-17-2005, 02:07 AM	#8
tgs Join Date Mar 2007 Age 48 Posts 5,125 Senior Member	Friends, I have quoted from the book authored by V.P.PURUSHOTHAM- Sanga Kala Mannargal Nilai Varalaru, which has also a foreword by Director of International Tamil Studies and ThaniTamil movement Scholor Mr.SalaIlanthiraiyan. Silapathikaram Line tells Kumari Kodu, does not means Kandam, and moreover Satelite Pictures do not support any Below SEA land mass Between Indian Ocean to Pacific. Pavanar Schools Mr.Kodumudi Shanmugam in his Recent book completely Disowns Kumari Kandam Fables siting the above and the CENTENARY Meeting in Honour of Pavanr in Chennai University. MosesSolomon sorry sirs, a foreword by the director of tanithamizh movement---------------any politician never ever did any grasp on LANGUAGE , CLASSICAL that is , and CIVILIZATION(everybody will agree sure on civilization and politician Iam sure) AND heard of the ATLANTIS- go to http://www.atlan.org/book/ please see it for yourselvesLOST CONTINENT ? FOR A LONG time until ARCHAEOLOGY and OCEANOLOGY took the subject everybody thought it was A MYTH, BUT NO , THERE WAS ATLANTIS scientists say now!!!!! as the wise old king said(solomon) there is no satellite pictures or physical underwater Reef or Ridges yet of the submerged Atlantis!! YET OCEAN ARCHAEOLOGY reveals possibilities of a submerged land mass in the Atlantic ocean. THAT IS BECAUSE THE EARTH'S CRUST MOVES A LOT IN 1000'S OF YEARS; AND SIMILARLY NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ARCHAEOLOGY also AGREES to the history of KUMARI CONTINENT -ALONG with existence of the city of DWARAKA that LORD KRISHNA BUILT FOR HIS PEOPLE and that a bigger city of MAHABALIPURAM AND POOMPUGAAR AS PROVED BY THE EXPEDITIONS OF SIR GRAHAM HANCOCK AND THE ROYAL BRITISH DEPARTMENT OF ARCHAEOLOGY(visit Graham Hancock Ocean archaeology websites) By the by have you read the North Indian Historians giving proof on the TIMELINE OF LORD KRISHNA IN THE YEAR 4,100 B.C.E. AND THEIR EARLIEST SANSKRIT WORK BASED ON THE POSITION OF STARS AND CONSTELLATIONS IN THAT PERIOD TO ABOUT 8,000 B.C.E. BASED ON THE SAME CALCULATIONS THEY HAVE ALSO DERIVED THE TIMELINE OF TAMIL WORKS TO 65OO B.C.E. (read it in my previous links on these calculations). According to those SENIOR North Indian Historians these are scientific facts that holds good. WHEN SCIENCE SAYS IT YOU SHOULD BE BRAVE ENOUGH TO ACCEPT THAT THE EARLIEST TAMIZH AND SANSKRIT WORKS DATE AROUND 6500 TO 8,000 B.C.E.
	Quote