DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**SingleMan** · 07-11-2012, 01:36 AM

Not likely. Your premiums would be about the same assuming there is nothing grossly abnormal about you.

Especially since the over all size of the insurance pool has been increased so the per person costs should either be the same or slightly lower. Of course, expanding the insurance pool to it's logical largest extent, the whole population of an entire country, would have the widest possible distribution of risk resulting in the lowest possible cost per person. Dozens of countries manage to do this well so I refuse to believe the US is uniquely unable to do so; it's just a matter of getting the greedy and useless middle men out of their rent seeking positions.

07-11-2012, 01:36 AM	#32
SingleMan Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 459 Senior Member	Not likely. Your premiums would be about the same assuming there is nothing grossly abnormal about you. Especially since the over all size of the insurance pool has been increased so the per person costs should either be the same or slightly lower. Of course, expanding the insurance pool to it's logical largest extent, the whole population of an entire country, would have the widest possible distribution of risk resulting in the lowest possible cost per person. Dozens of countries manage to do this well so I refuse to believe the US is uniquely unable to do so; it's just a matter of getting the greedy and useless middle men out of their rent seeking positions.
	Quote