[HedgeYourBets]

Dear Thiru Soloman,

History telling is based on scientifical facts and not that compromising like ‘two eyes’ and such kind of integrity / unity making.

You think that there are three major religions. But there are lot of religions in world which induced this three religions. That spoke history. These three religions have made world divided. Unification of these / the trying to do this will make another religion.
Hence Kindly do not make history interpretation based on commonness but make through facts.

Tamil is the eldest. The results got from the following interpretations proved this.

1. All Indo-European root words are available in tamil.

2. Most of the Indo-European root words are not available in Sanskrit.

3. Roots of all Sanskrit words are available in tamil whereas most of the Sanskrit roots are not available with Sanskrit.

4. Sanskrit literature were made collectively during 2nd and 3rd centuries. Carbon dating proof is there.

5.The astrological calculations mentioned in the Sanskrit literature do not mean the historical incidents of prehistoric period happened while people talked Sanskrit language. This is like someother history telling in someother language.

6. Sanskrit literature belongs to certain religion which was induced by cultural habits of old tamils.

7. Tamil literature are secular in nature because lot of religions formulated in tamil land / / Indian land whereas Sanskrit literature belongs to latest evolved religion.

8. Sanskrit was never spoken anywhere in India. It was ‘othuvar’ language / God language / Deva Basha.

9. Pragrid was evolved from tamil and the archestrated form of Pragrid is Sanskrit. Sanskrit Grammar was not written in Sanskrit.


If you analyse history in this perspective you will find lot of evidences / proofs.

f.s.gandhi