DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**MannoFr** · 05-15-2006, 08:00 AM

The tone of your Replies by Idiayppam does not look like defending a truth , but to hurt an oppenant, so that Truth need not be analysed.

I Need not have to get a Certificate to Prove my mother Tounge is.

Dating of Literature is not done by me, but by Scholars especially without any internal motives. Tholkappiayam Dating with any Previuous needs appropriate proofs.

Tamil Literature is generally written in OLA and they cannot be preserved morethan 300 years, where as Bible was written on Leather and Papyrus. Similarly Ramayan Manuscript of 100 CE is dated to Ist Cen is in BARODA Museum, you can verify. Dating of RAamayan I gave is accepted by DevanayaPavanar and ALL International Universities, see www.wikhipedia.com

Dating of Rig Veda, was back dated by Maxmuller to 1300 to 400 BCE, that is to back Bible OT which Moses is dated to 13th Cen.
But evidence from Archealogy at Babylon and other places dates Vedas to 2000 BCE to 600 BCE, whereas Books of Moses to later than 350 BCE. See Cambridege, Oxford or any reputed Universities, researches.
India- properly Hindustan derives from the name -The Land mass between Himalayas to Indumaha Samudram, the previleaged place of God, and people here are Hindus, and Bible book of Esther-200BCE, names Hindu country.
Moreover Indian Culture extended up to Babylon, i.e., Iran and Iraq, the Khandara of Mahabharat is in Afganistan-Ghandahar of Highjack fame etc.,

Tholkappiar was Brahmin, who new Sanskrit and refers to Sanskrit Thrice for accepting Sanskrit words to Tamil and Sanskritized Letters (Vadamozhi), Tiruvalluvar uses Adi in Kural no 1 and other places, whereas Present Dravidian Govts changed the name Agaradhi- to AgaraMudali?

Sangam Literature names Nanmarai many a times and hiding this is foolish.
I donot wear My Special Dresses daily and till Writing was Perfected Sanskrit was not used in Stone Inscriptions and that doesnot mean it does not exisit earlier.
Pali is clearly a Collequial Sanskrit and Nobody can backdate it.

Another Big myth, Sanskrit was never spoken, Friends these Popular Foolish statements may get Applause in meetings, but any Serious and Sincere Linguistic Scholar would not put such Statement, every one knows it takes Centuries for the formation to take place. Moreover Literary evidences tells much, Ramayan and Mahabarat are in more sppech toungue, where as Kalidas etc., goes to highly Gramerised Yappu, and that was the reason for slow moving of Sanskrit fom common person, where as Veda Vyasa had Non-Brahimin Disciples.
We Cannot understand Tamil if Pure Senthamilz is spoken, we need Explanations for Even Tirukural. Which is in Simple Tamil. By insisting Purity of Language, Sanskrit grew, but without being a commoner Speaking it. We can explain this To LATIN, inspite of Raman Govt Language, insistance of Grammer Purity it lost itself. Hebrew which was just used in worship became common language of Israel is now widely used now by Jews, whereas Foolishly we adopted Hindi-English in the name of Secularism and now these flasehood researchers spread false preachings.

If anybody accept Tamil and Sanskrit, he is not a Anti-Tamil but accepts Truths.

FSG: Because Christianity(Xty) wanted to spread itself, spoiled the natives , today America, Australia, Philipines –the natives are minorities to less than 10%, by the time Xty came to India, Civilisation has grown and Killing was not possible and They used Dividie and rule. The Earliest visitor to Madurai-Robert-Denobili had to learn Telugu/Tamil and Sanskrit to Probagate, and made A Forgery Veda and Caught and left and died a lonely death in Chennai.

Hating Sanskrit and spreading Falsehood does not help, where as Tamil has much better Grammer and much widely spoken is a Truth.

None of the Tamil Literaure Olaichuvadis are older than 16th Cen, and saying Carbon dated are clear Lies.

DevanaeyaPavanar a Christian started Falsehood, and he uses theBible Genesis story of Noah flood, by dating the book to 5000BCE, which is actually 300 BCE, and that the Cosmic flood dated by Bible in 2200BCE, is now rejected as a Pure Legend, as Mummies and Indus-Saraswathy Archealogy proves.

Dividing of all roots is possible, but they are not Linguistically correct and any body can interpret on their convenience.

Sanskrit and Tamil was created from common say Proto-Indian Language and hence similarites always is there, and religious beliefs say that way only.

-edited-

MosesMohammedSolomon

05-15-2006, 08:00 AM	#26
MannoFr Join Date Mar 2007 Posts 4,451 Senior Member	The tone of your Replies by Idiayppam does not look like defending a truth , but to hurt an oppenant, so that Truth need not be analysed. I Need not have to get a Certificate to Prove my mother Tounge is. Dating of Literature is not done by me, but by Scholars especially without any internal motives. Tholkappiayam Dating with any Previuous needs appropriate proofs. Tamil Literature is generally written in OLA and they cannot be preserved morethan 300 years, where as Bible was written on Leather and Papyrus. Similarly Ramayan Manuscript of 100 CE is dated to Ist Cen is in BARODA Museum, you can verify. Dating of RAamayan I gave is accepted by DevanayaPavanar and ALL International Universities, see www.wikhipedia.com Dating of Rig Veda, was back dated by Maxmuller to 1300 to 400 BCE, that is to back Bible OT which Moses is dated to 13th Cen. But evidence from Archealogy at Babylon and other places dates Vedas to 2000 BCE to 600 BCE, whereas Books of Moses to later than 350 BCE. See Cambridege, Oxford or any reputed Universities, researches. India- properly Hindustan derives from the name -The Land mass between Himalayas to Indumaha Samudram, the previleaged place of God, and people here are Hindus, and Bible book of Esther-200BCE, names Hindu country. Moreover Indian Culture extended up to Babylon, i.e., Iran and Iraq, the Khandara of Mahabharat is in Afganistan-Ghandahar of Highjack fame etc., Tholkappiar was Brahmin, who new Sanskrit and refers to Sanskrit Thrice for accepting Sanskrit words to Tamil and Sanskritized Letters (Vadamozhi), Tiruvalluvar uses Adi in Kural no 1 and other places, whereas Present Dravidian Govts changed the name Agaradhi- to AgaraMudali? Sangam Literature names Nanmarai many a times and hiding this is foolish. I donot wear My Special Dresses daily and till Writing was Perfected Sanskrit was not used in Stone Inscriptions and that doesnot mean it does not exisit earlier. Pali is clearly a Collequial Sanskrit and Nobody can backdate it. Another Big myth, Sanskrit was never spoken, Friends these Popular Foolish statements may get Applause in meetings, but any Serious and Sincere Linguistic Scholar would not put such Statement, every one knows it takes Centuries for the formation to take place. Moreover Literary evidences tells much, Ramayan and Mahabarat are in more sppech toungue, where as Kalidas etc., goes to highly Gramerised Yappu, and that was the reason for slow moving of Sanskrit fom common person, where as Veda Vyasa had Non-Brahimin Disciples. We Cannot understand Tamil if Pure Senthamilz is spoken, we need Explanations for Even Tirukural. Which is in Simple Tamil. By insisting Purity of Language, Sanskrit grew, but without being a commoner Speaking it. We can explain this To LATIN, inspite of Raman Govt Language, insistance of Grammer Purity it lost itself. Hebrew which was just used in worship became common language of Israel is now widely used now by Jews, whereas Foolishly we adopted Hindi-English in the name of Secularism and now these flasehood researchers spread false preachings. If anybody accept Tamil and Sanskrit, he is not a Anti-Tamil but accepts Truths. FSG: Because Christianity(Xty) wanted to spread itself, spoiled the natives , today America, Australia, Philipines –the natives are minorities to less than 10%, by the time Xty came to India, Civilisation has grown and Killing was not possible and They used Dividie and rule. The Earliest visitor to Madurai-Robert-Denobili had to learn Telugu/Tamil and Sanskrit to Probagate, and made A Forgery Veda and Caught and left and died a lonely death in Chennai. Hating Sanskrit and spreading Falsehood does not help, where as Tamil has much better Grammer and much widely spoken is a Truth. None of the Tamil Literaure Olaichuvadis are older than 16th Cen, and saying Carbon dated are clear Lies. DevanaeyaPavanar a Christian started Falsehood, and he uses theBible Genesis story of Noah flood, by dating the book to 5000BCE, which is actually 300 BCE, and that the Cosmic flood dated by Bible in 2200BCE, is now rejected as a Pure Legend, as Mummies and Indus-Saraswathy Archealogy proves. Dividing of all roots is possible, but they are not Linguistically correct and any body can interpret on their convenience. Sanskrit and Tamil was created from common say Proto-Indian Language and hence similarites always is there, and religious beliefs say that way only. -edited- MosesMohammedSolomon
	Quote