[NeroASERCH]

Dear Thiru idiappam,

You have revealed good queries before soloman. He has not mentioned truthful evidences in support his views. Thank you.

Dear Thiru soloman,

I pose you some questions since we have already discussed all the issues in varrious topics in this forum which you make front stage now.

You are boastfully trying to make sanskrit history equal to tamil.

Let me pose some questions to you which may induce you to give some answers.

1. Don't you think that so far evacuvated inscriptions of tamil Brahmi script all over india proves the antiquity of tamil( 500 BC) than sanskrit ?

2. Don't you think so far evacuvated pali Brahmi script of King Ashokas period (300 BC) never contains sanskrit and sanskrit devanagiri script so far evacuated in india is belonging to (800 AD) ?

3. Don't you think tamil has roots not only for sanskrit language but for old languages like sumerian,Arabian,Akkadian and semiththian whereas sanskrit never has resemblance with them ?

4. Don't you think tamil gods,worshiping habits & customs followed not only in world ancient civilizations but also in vedhic sanskrit?

5.Aryan theory is wrong and dravidian theory is also wrong. But Don't you think Sindhu valley civilisation never contains so called vedhic tradition?

6.Don't you think The east linguistics scholars accepted tamil's antiquity that it must be the language of man when he evolved? Don't you think 'Troskin'- a chinean revealed this ?

7. Don' t you think structurewise -Grammaticalwise all east world languages resemble tamil and not Sanskrit ?

8. Don't you think all tribal people of earth's southern hemisphere resemble tamil ?

9. Don't you think all west languages words have roots in tamil ?

10. Don't you think western linguistics accepted tamils antiquity ?

11. Instead of searching vedhic elements in tamil sankam literature Don't you think searching out tamil culture elements in vedhic literature ?

12. Don't you think tamil version and sanskrit version caste system are somewhat same in nature but different in meaning after tamil king 'manu' went north and formulated 'manusmirithi' and subsequently 'Bhagavatgita' ?

13. Don't you think tamil god inthra and siva used in all four vedhas ? And Manusmirthi and Bhagavatigita were formulated when saiva and vaishnava (vinnava) fighting was going ?

14. Don't you think all north indian tribal languages including the 'Pragui' which is now in palusistan are much resemble tamil and no way to connected to sanskrit ?

15. And at last why don't you discuss issue by issue here ? You seem to be lambasting dravidian at one hand and boasting sanskrit on another - why this hurry / dilemma ? Cool down solomon.

Let us go one by one . You start give sanskrit history with all your proofs. We give tamil history with all proofs. We still more extend this with analysing the structure and formation of language. Okay 8)


f.s.gandhi