DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**doctorzlo** · 04-26-2006, 08:00 AM

Dear Thiru Solomon,

Kinldy under this column do not talk about history.

Thiru Sudhaama who intitiated this topic will get angry.

This is the thread to talk about thirukkrual verses and their meaning. Kindly discuss history in relevant column.

Anyway, Thirukkural - 100 CE carbon dating proof is there. That is correct.

We need not talk about Thiru Vaiyapuripillai’s theory. He neither analysed the pattern of old poetry nor the time specified in the literary works. His views are vague and nothing seems to be correct in interpretation.

For example, There are several ‘Avvaiyars’ from 0CE to 1000 CE. He interprets that there is one ‘Avvaiyar’ which proved wrong in history.

G.U.Pope did translated works and it seems that he did not analyse historic perspective of tamil poetry.

f.s.gandhi

04-26-2006, 08:00 AM	#21
doctorzlo Join Date Jun 2006 Posts 4,488 Senior Member	Dear Thiru Solomon, Kinldy under this column do not talk about history. Thiru Sudhaama who intitiated this topic will get angry. This is the thread to talk about thirukkrual verses and their meaning. Kindly discuss history in relevant column. Anyway, Thirukkural - 100 CE carbon dating proof is there. That is correct. We need not talk about Thiru Vaiyapuripillai’s theory. He neither analysed the pattern of old poetry nor the time specified in the literary works. His views are vague and nothing seems to be correct in interpretation. For example, There are several ‘Avvaiyars’ from 0CE to 1000 CE. He interprets that there is one ‘Avvaiyar’ which proved wrong in history. G.U.Pope did translated works and it seems that he did not analyse historic perspective of tamil poetry. f.s.gandhi
	Quote