DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**Beerinkol** · 08-03-2006, 08:00 AM

A lot of assumptions you have posted there! Never mind! But just to punture a gapping hole in your thought! Refering to what you said:

Sanskrit Literature has its good as much as Tamil, and We donot have One Pre Sanskrit Tamil work. Ashtadyayi fame, Panini of 400BCE did not name Sanskrit (or samksrut, samskrit - or whatever that may be its name) as a language he is talking about.

For what language did Panini write grammer for, then? Some Prakirts? When was the "Samskrit" came into being as a name for a language??

All this point just to one thing. Sanskrit was non-existence prior to the 2nd Centure CE - when Valmiki Ramayana was written!

The rest of your lament is noted!

08-03-2006, 08:00 AM	#33
Beerinkol Join Date Dec 2006 Posts 5,268 Senior Member	A lot of assumptions you have posted there! Never mind! But just to punture a gapping hole in your thought! Refering to what you said: Sanskrit Literature has its good as much as Tamil, and We donot have One Pre Sanskrit Tamil work. Ashtadyayi fame, Panini of 400BCE did not name Sanskrit (or samksrut, samskrit - or whatever that may be its name) as a language he is talking about. For what language did Panini write grammer for, then? Some Prakirts? When was the "Samskrit" came into being as a name for a language?? All this point just to one thing. Sanskrit was non-existence prior to the 2nd Centure CE - when Valmiki Ramayana was written! The rest of your lament is noted!
	Quote