View Single Post
Old 03-28-2009, 08:47 PM   #6
PhillipHer

Join Date
Jun 2008
Age
58
Posts
4,481
Senior Member
Default
His anger was when you said IR has delivered thrash for low-budget films as well(I think you meant even he has delivered some bad songs even for low-budget films but your statement over-generalised it). Wrong decision to make. That is like saying about 60% of raja films are thrash...which IR fan will not get angry over that?
That's the mistake. I even clarified him later that i did not communicate it properly.

60% of raja films are trash - I really don't know how my statement conveys such a meaning. I said that "IR has done low budget movies and delivered poor songs". I'm wondering how this small statement conveys such a message. Never will i say like this unless i'm a nutt or i'm from anti-IR group!

I should have suffixed IMHO - Hmmm... Even if I had put it, AE wouldn't have spared me. Avar andha alavukku en mEla kOvathula irukkaru. (of course, for no reason)

nAn explain panninadhu pathAdhu'nu few more hubbers (who very much know me and my preference) explained the exact meaning of my post. He never bothered about it. He stuck to his point. It's ridiculous!
PhillipHer is offline


 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:44 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity