DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**CIAFreeAgent** · 07-13-2012, 01:55 PM

So it's ok in principle to lie to American voters about something that may otherwise cost you votes? No, not on principle. But when you've got only two choices, and both of them lie about things, it makes sense to go with the one who lies about less important things (e.g., this crap) rather than the things Obama has lied about (jobs, gitmo, taxes).

It appears their own SEC filings contradict that. I mean, maybe? They show he had titles. He acknowledges having the titles but denies having responsibility for Bain during that period, and Bain backs him up on that...

07-13-2012, 01:55 PM	#6
CIAFreeAgent Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 671 Senior Member	So it's ok in principle to lie to American voters about something that may otherwise cost you votes? No, not on principle. But when you've got only two choices, and both of them lie about things, it makes sense to go with the one who lies about less important things (e.g., this crap) rather than the things Obama has lied about (jobs, gitmo, taxes). It appears their own SEC filings contradict that. I mean, maybe? They show he had titles. He acknowledges having the titles but denies having responsibility for Bain during that period, and Bain backs him up on that...
	Quote