DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**Lt_Apple** · 09-06-2012, 11:26 AM

The debate was not a wrong one to enter into and it is good for a WP MP to realize WP needs to catch up on social media. No dispute on this.

The 2 killer points were alleging AL's PAP links and casting asperions on Publichouse's actual funding. These were unnecessary.

I think the debate was a waste of time and was intended so by AH rather than Pritam. My understanding was that AH started acting in an accusing manner without merit. I also believe that it is perfectly fine that Pritam asks AH about his PAP, WP, SDP or any other political links past and present. Publichouse's funding should also be taken into account because all these allow everyone and not just Pritam to understand AH's terms of engagement. Everyone knows Pritam's political links and to a certain extent how he earns his keep so why should AH's be kept a secret? It doesn't make sense. If AH wants to blog then so be it but once he attacks an MP ferociously then it is fine that the MP asks him these questions and also for others to know.

AH doesn't have to answer if he thinks he doesn't want to but it is perfectly fine that Pritam asks these very relevant questions for himself and for others that read AH's blogs.

09-06-2012, 11:26 AM	#12
Lt_Apple Join Date Dec 2008 Posts 4,489 Senior Member	The debate was not a wrong one to enter into and it is good for a WP MP to realize WP needs to catch up on social media. No dispute on this. The 2 killer points were alleging AL's PAP links and casting asperions on Publichouse's actual funding. These were unnecessary. I think the debate was a waste of time and was intended so by AH rather than Pritam. My understanding was that AH started acting in an accusing manner without merit. I also believe that it is perfectly fine that Pritam asks AH about his PAP, WP, SDP or any other political links past and present. Publichouse's funding should also be taken into account because all these allow everyone and not just Pritam to understand AH's terms of engagement. Everyone knows Pritam's political links and to a certain extent how he earns his keep so why should AH's be kept a secret? It doesn't make sense. If AH wants to blog then so be it but once he attacks an MP ferociously then it is fine that the MP asks him these questions and also for others to know. AH doesn't have to answer if he thinks he doesn't want to but it is perfectly fine that Pritam asks these very relevant questions for himself and for others that read AH's blogs.
	Quote