Thread
:
PARLIAMENT Confrontational debate not the way
View Single Post
08-21-2012, 01:02 PM
#
10
PhillipHer
Join Date
Jun 2008
Age
58
Posts
4,481
Senior Member
The question raised by MP Sylvia Lim torches on the issue of "Dishonesty" of the well connected Woffles Wu in regard to his speeding offence and why was the Penal Code not thrown at him. It looks like Minister Sham misses the point and came out with 6 cases all dealing with how traffic offences were being dealt with which has no bearing on the issue of "Dishonesty" raised. There is clearly no meeting of the mind whether on purpose or otherwise or is it the case of Minister Sham missing the the issue of "Dishonesty" at law raised by MP Sylvia Lim. I think Minister Sham was trying to muddle the issue of "Dishonesty" so as to avoid answering it outright which he has no answer for it. Now the public has to form it's own conclusion as to how Woffles Wu escape the hard sentencing under the Penal Code for dishonesty where the State is concerned. Minister Sham has failed to answer the boo boos of his Ministry.
Quote
PhillipHer
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by PhillipHer
All times are GMT +1. The time now is
09:26 AM
.