DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**LottiFurmann** · 07-26-2012, 05:29 PM

Maybe the judge for the SPH editor's case, Justice Choo Han Teck, was also "meditating" when he sentenced her to one day's jail and a $10,000 for causing death by dangerous driving. Proof that he was "inattentive" - the defense lawyer and prosecutors have to get hold of him that same afternoon to tell him that the section of the Road Traffic Act under which the editor was charged only allowed him to impose jail time and NOT a fine. Shouldn't the bloody judge have read the section first before he passed sentence?

07-26-2012, 05:29 PM	#13
LottiFurmann Join Date Jan 2008 Posts 4,494 Senior Member	Maybe the judge for the SPH editor's case, Justice Choo Han Teck, was also "meditating" when he sentenced her to one day's jail and a $10,000 for causing death by dangerous driving. Proof that he was "inattentive" - the defense lawyer and prosecutors have to get hold of him that same afternoon to tell him that the section of the Road Traffic Act under which the editor was charged only allowed him to impose jail time and NOT a fine. Shouldn't the bloody judge have read the section first before he passed sentence?
	Quote