Scientist (???) Rojak, OK...so what? That make it 99.999%, if you think 99% is still not good for you. What does all these mean....you said: It's because of nature's stress.....you cooking up story again...on one hand, the theory of evolution says (or implies) that somehow the process of natural selection has some form of 'imbedded' intelligence to promote and to enhance life from the most primitive to now, presumably, the most advance and now you saying the the stress of nature has caused extinction of animals, and 99% of them to date? Isn't this completely contradicted what evolution is all about? How come only in the recent years (relatively speaking in relation to the million or billion of years that evolutionists commonly referred to) that the stress of nature suddenly took place and has caused 99% of the animals to extinct? Would this 'intelligent' law of nature try, at least, to preserve them, or the law is now stupid enough to evolve something better of what nature has produced so far?