DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**doctorzlo** · 04-30-2012, 10:20 PM

Darwin never proved one specie evolved from another. You think you can do better than Darwin and prove evolution?

How does it describe a flawed understanding of the big bang? Please explain yourself.

The stars explode, they disintegrate, they don't form into bigger stars. Thats the 2nd law of thermodynamics clearly in play.

on Darwin and his publication "On the Origin of Species by means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favored Races in the Struggle for Life":
you're right to say that he did not prove that one species evolved to another, he only proposed the idea of one species evolving to another. his observation was mirrored independently by Alfred Wallace whom was working in the South-East Asian region. biologists around the world have amalgamated enough evidence to support the theory of evolution at this point in time. it is my time to shine? no, me don't need to be in the spot light. shattering your miserable misconception gives enough pleasure.

on your flawed understanding of the Big Bang, read the other thread you've started. for the rest of the readers, click here to marvel the comprehension skills of our dear kinana

and, by the way, for the last time: nothing exploded in the Big Bang

on supernovas and star formation: in the theory of evolution, we are discussing about living organisms, which includes both flora and fauna, bacteria/fungi and/or other life forms inclusive. we're talking about these living things evolving over a period of time. you want to include supernovas and star formations, that's under astrophysics.

last but not the least, you have not demonstrated that the 2nd law of thermodynamics disproving the theory of evolution. still waiting for a more sensible and/or logical explanation from you. me can wait, not sure about other readers whom are supposedly chuckling right now

04-30-2012, 10:20 PM	#33
doctorzlo Join Date Jun 2006 Posts 4,488 Senior Member	Darwin never proved one specie evolved from another. You think you can do better than Darwin and prove evolution? How does it describe a flawed understanding of the big bang? Please explain yourself. The stars explode, they disintegrate, they don't form into bigger stars. Thats the 2nd law of thermodynamics clearly in play. on Darwin and his publication "On the Origin of Species by means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favored Races in the Struggle for Life": you're right to say that he did not prove that one species evolved to another, he only proposed the idea of one species evolving to another. his observation was mirrored independently by Alfred Wallace whom was working in the South-East Asian region. biologists around the world have amalgamated enough evidence to support the theory of evolution at this point in time. it is my time to shine? no, me don't need to be in the spot light. shattering your miserable misconception gives enough pleasure. on your flawed understanding of the Big Bang, read the other thread you've started. for the rest of the readers, click here to marvel the comprehension skills of our dear kinana and, by the way, for the last time: nothing exploded in the Big Bang on supernovas and star formation: in the theory of evolution, we are discussing about living organisms, which includes both flora and fauna, bacteria/fungi and/or other life forms inclusive. we're talking about these living things evolving over a period of time. you want to include supernovas and star formations, that's under astrophysics. last but not the least, you have not demonstrated that the 2nd law of thermodynamics disproving the theory of evolution. still waiting for a more sensible and/or logical explanation from you. me can wait, not sure about other readers whom are supposedly chuckling right now
	Quote