DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**radikal** · 04-13-2012, 12:27 PM

Clone: Historical Jesus was a real person.

A revolutionary of his time but His message got lost along the way. This is based on whose account? How did this person derive at such conclusion? Does he tell you that you should believe in him because those who did not believe is ignorance and true happiness is to believe in the existence of Jesus even without proof?

Your own comment already proves that there is no evidence of his existence. All evidence of his existence is base on the assumption that he existed and then creating proof of his existence. Such pre-suppositions plus their evidence created to support are misleading and should not be trusted.

04-13-2012, 12:27 PM	#10
radikal Join Date Oct 2005 Age 54 Posts 4,523 Senior Member	Clone: Historical Jesus was a real person. A revolutionary of his time but His message got lost along the way. This is based on whose account? How did this person derive at such conclusion? Does he tell you that you should believe in him because those who did not believe is ignorance and true happiness is to believe in the existence of Jesus even without proof? Your own comment already proves that there is no evidence of his existence. All evidence of his existence is base on the assumption that he existed and then creating proof of his existence. Such pre-suppositions plus their evidence created to support are misleading and should not be trusted.
	Quote