[radikal]

[QUOTE=fishbuff;986553]aiyo... the whole world is about science, facts, rationality and reasoning......QUOTE]

Dear Gorilla-Fishbuff,

It's all about science...hmmmm....so, scientifically-speaking, can you tell the world what percentage of similarity you have with gorilla - 15%, 50%, 75% or 99%....

Please don't be lied by those evolutionists......they give numbers that no one could really understand...they go by million and million of years......and yet people like you believe all these million, million years of rubbish. Furthermore, today they tell you you are 15% similar to gorilla, tomorrow they tell you you are 35% similar to crocodile.....few days later you have someone to 'confirm' oh, no, we are more like elephant....though I may make up these, but these are what we heard often.

Commonsense tell you....even though bones are very stron, they will all turn to ashes after million years. So, how could they find those countless gigantic dinosaur bones so intact. At most, they just look few thousand years old and not million years ago. Another factor, the earth indeed is very active. The earth is subject ot constant earth movements like earthquake and how could these huge dinosaur bones remained intact after 70 - 100 million years. And not one...they are countless of dinosaur fossils with complete bone structure intact all over the world. How could this happen?

If you have been to an old grave exhumation (e.g. grave that is 70 to 100 years old), you can notice that when the grave was dugged up, literally nothing can be found in the coffin. The remains of dead person's bones just turned into 'ashes'. You can't see any bone remains. Yet, after 70 80 million years and still you can find the dinosaur bones in 'good condition'? This question has been asked by creationists but the evolutionists simply ignored this question. No organic substances can remain intact after 70-80 million years. To add insult to the intelligent, some evolutionist scientists claim they can even find some blood in the bones! Give me a break, the presence of blood after 70 million years!

But they are many discoveries that actually support the stories told in the Bibles. For example, the Bible told us there were giants and indeed, many human fossil of exceptional sizes 8 ft and even 9 ft have been discovered; the oldest tree so far discovered is about 5,000 years ago and to date you one has has found any tree that is older than 5,000 years. If the earth was indeed million years old (or billion years) old, why can't they find trees that are 100,000 years old or even older? Bible scholars have been able to re-construct the tible scale from Adam's day to the present time and by examination the age of the people (e.g. Adam, Noah and their children, etc) recorded in the OT and they came out with a convincing time scale that the earth is perhaps 10,000 or less. Factor into the event of the flood, the age of the oldest tree of about 5,000 fully support this time scale that the earth is indeed a young earth of just few thousand years old.