[Big A]

And read at the VERY TOP of the same post. Or better yet, go to the rest of my 8000+ posts and see if anything else accords with that totally uncharacteristic view you are applying to me. But, this is the best you've got. Obviously if you had anything else, you'd be touting that instead of some out of context fragment of what I said many months ago.

You can't classify every Muslim with a gun as a terrorist. Many of their acts don't count as terrorism, though they may be human rights violations, or acts of our enemies. But to class them as terrorists in order to blur the distinction between political and religious conflicts is propaganda. When a group turns its sites at soldiers and government installations, it is no longer a terrorist activity, even when it is performed by a terrorist group.

That's right you lying scum. HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS punishable to the full extent including capital punishment. But killing a captive soldier on contested ground is a war crime, not an act of terrorism. That's not justifying it in the least, anymore than distinguishing between rape and murder is a justification of either. We were arguing about terminology, not whether it is right or wrong. I realize you'd like the world to believe that every single Muslim with a gun standing on contested ground anywhere in the world is a terrorist, but that's a lie that's going to catch up with you.

I do not support ANY method of killing innocent civilians, nor is there a single post that you can twist to make it seem that way. I do not support the killing of captives. That is a war crime. Frankly, if the powers that be on this forum think that I do, go ahead and ban me. It won't mean that I do or that you were correct.

Hizbollah needs to be brought before the international court for war crimes it committed during the war in Lebanon. As well, they committed acts of terrorism by firing randomly at Israeli civilians.