DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**lionsiy** · 09-02-2012, 06:32 PM

I don't think it's intended as an alternative to turning it off in the normal way (onto standby with the remote), but more so that after it's been on standby for a while it'll cut the standby power.

Which, even though the VoltsCommisioner wouldn't agree, will save sod all power in the scheme of things. I do beleive that every little bit counts, but some bits are so small as to have no effect.
Once people turn off their lights and ceiling & pedestal fans when they're not in a room, then reducing standby power loads will have a significant effect.

09-02-2012, 06:32 PM	#7
lionsiy Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 565 Senior Member	I don't think it's intended as an alternative to turning it off in the normal way (onto standby with the remote), but more so that after it's been on standby for a while it'll cut the standby power. Which, even though the VoltsCommisioner wouldn't agree, will save sod all power in the scheme of things. I do beleive that every little bit counts, but some bits are so small as to have no effect. Once people turn off their lights and ceiling & pedestal fans when they're not in a room, then reducing standby power loads will have a significant effect.
	Quote