View Single Post
Old 08-20-2012, 10:41 PM   #83
SpecialOFFER

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
613
Senior Member
Default
I don't agree the humans will need a physical presence in space unless we actual find life. Everything else can be done more efficiently and cheaper by a machine.

Going just for the sake of going is a bit pointless and far too risky.
That's OK, but your wrong on both counts.


>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
Well we're either wanting to do science, or wanting to satisfy our destiny.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>


Both.




>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
would it be possible to add a centrifuge section to the ISS to gather data on the region between 0 and 1 G?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>


I've asked that exact question...
We would be capable of doing it, [and probably will after the life time of the present ISS] but damn costs are far more to do it.

Building a a space station ala 2001: A Space Odyssey would cover all contingencies with 1G at the circumference, reducing the further towards the center we go to cover for all possible experiemnts.
SpecialOFFER is offline


 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:05 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity