[AbeldeldepBug]

Thank you all for the replies.

I would point out that I know of many people who call themselves Buddhist, but engage in many activities that would be antithetical to the traditional Buddhist teachings. Maybe this is what has led to some confusion, on my part.

Since I am utilizing these teachings as a way to be a better human being, rather than find some type of saving or healing, is being a 'Buddhist' that important? What if it really does work out, and I do become a better person... wouldn't it be a great credit to the philosophy to be labeled as such?

Which schools of Buddhism are more open to differing views on this topic? I ask so that I may choose a course of study that is more pertinent to my current philosophy, even though I am open to a natural evolution of many of my beliefs. Also, I am very cognizant of not offending anyone who may hold these beliefs in a more puritanical light than others.

Thanks!

kereD