DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**RildFiemodo** · 06-01-2012, 11:48 AM

Is it blameless to kill, when the enemy is one who can't be spoken to, stopped through peaceful protests, or non-violent actions, and is only bent on your destruction, and that of your loved ones, and in self defense?

My short answer is yes, given the circumstances. Morality is not abiding my a strict code of conduct when certain situations imply that doing so causes more harm than good.

06-01-2012, 11:48 AM	#39
RildFiemodo Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 438 Senior Member	Is it blameless to kill, when the enemy is one who can't be spoken to, stopped through peaceful protests, or non-violent actions, and is only bent on your destruction, and that of your loved ones, and in self defense? My short answer is yes, given the circumstances. Morality is not abiding my a strict code of conduct when certain situations imply that doing so causes more harm than good.
	Quote