Thread
:
Literal Interpretation or Metaphor ?
View Single Post
05-05-2012, 04:17 PM
#
3
Mr_White
Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
594
Senior Member
I am not sure 'metaphor' is the right approach. Buddha often used simile & metaphor but then usually explained the symbolism of the metaphor, such as:
Sense desires are like bare bones, has the Blessed One said; they are like a lump of flesh, like a torch of straw, like a pit of burning coals, like a dream, like borrowed goods, like a fruit-bearing tree, like a slaughter house, like a stake of swords, like a snake's head, are sense desires, has the Blessed One said. but if we are referring to words such as
jati
(birth), for example, they are not metaphor. jati refers to the birth (coming in being) of some something, although that something may be mental, physical, etc, such as:
Tamenaṃ
jātaṃ
samānaṃ sakena lohitena poseti
When the child is
born
, she feeds it with her own blood
MN 38 rūpaṃ attato samanupassati. Yā kho pana sā, bhikkhave, samanupassanā saṅkhāro so. So pana saṅkhāro kiṃnidāno kiṃsamudayo kiṃ
jāti
ko kiṃpabhavo?
He assumes form to be the self. That assumption is a fabrication. Now what is the cause, what is the origination, what is the
birth
, what is the coming-into-existence of that fabrication?
SN 22.81
Quote
Mr_White
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Mr_White
All times are GMT +1. The time now is
07:04 PM
.