DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**BliliBoopsy** · 01-26-2012, 04:15 AM

the difficulty here is with Buddhism and comprehending Buddhism

for example:

Howdy,

4 noble truths and suffering, The reality and imagination. A humanbeing suffering with a cancer pain, do you think these (4 noble truts ) do help him or her? Lets be honest... At least (4 noble truths ) might be workable for some situations, but not for all of them!

***

If all of us have a Buddha nature that must be always in nibbana. If there is no self, there is no place to be in it. Whose gonna be at nibbana?

***

İn Buddhism there is no soul, no spirit, no atma and no self. Therefore there can be no rebirth neither. In other words, rebirth in Buddhism is not a personal one...

***

You need sex as you need to eat. These are natural insticts. Whoever refrain from sexual relations will be out of real life for sure.

***

The problem is that in reality Buddhism has a duality, one for lay people, one for the monks. This indicates that Buddhism is not precise. I am trying to show this dilemma. If we will not have any attachment we should not advocate this sort dualities. If Buddhism claims that Buddha Dhamma are the laws of nature, there is no such duality in nature.

Actually REBIRTH is not reencarnation. Because in order to reencarn you need a soul. In Buddhism there is no soul. So rebirth in Buddhism is not a personal one. There is no attachment, there is no personal rebirth neither. People who think the validity of rebirth are the ones who attach themselves to their no-self very tight.

01-26-2012, 04:15 AM	#3
BliliBoopsy Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 429 Senior Member	the difficulty here is with Buddhism and comprehending Buddhism for example: Howdy, 4 noble truths and suffering, The reality and imagination. A humanbeing suffering with a cancer pain, do you think these (4 noble truts ) do help him or her? Lets be honest... At least (4 noble truths ) might be workable for some situations, but not for all of them! * If all of us have a Buddha nature that must be always in nibbana. If there is no self, there is no place to be in it. Whose gonna be at nibbana? * İn Buddhism there is no soul, no spirit, no atma and no self. Therefore there can be no rebirth neither. In other words, rebirth in Buddhism is not a personal one... * You need sex as you need to eat. These are natural insticts. Whoever refrain from sexual relations will be out of real life for sure. * The problem is that in reality Buddhism has a duality, one for lay people, one for the monks. This indicates that Buddhism is not precise. I am trying to show this dilemma. If we will not have any attachment we should not advocate this sort dualities. If Buddhism claims that Buddha Dhamma are the laws of nature, there is no such duality in nature. Actually REBIRTH is not reencarnation. Because in order to reencarn you need a soul. In Buddhism there is no soul. So rebirth in Buddhism is not a personal one. There is no attachment, there is no personal rebirth neither. People who think the validity of rebirth are the ones who attach themselves to their no-self very tight.
	Quote