DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**BalaGire** · 01-26-2012, 04:53 AM

let us examine each of these statements in how they do not conform with Buddhism:

1. buddha taught suffering is attachment, caused by craving. cancer pain is not attachment. cancer pain is not craving. therefore, how can cancer pain be the dukkha the Buddha ended?

If there is no self, there is no place to be in it

2. the mind experiences nibbana. Dear Element,

Buddha says that ''attachment is the cause of suffering'' Here bothi indicates that without having any attachment, people are facing with cancer. Or even without having no time yet for an attachment, a baby is born with a birth defect which is a life long suffering. So what dear Element is saying does not conform what bothi is trying to show...

With regards,

01-26-2012, 04:53 AM	#5
BalaGire Join Date Nov 2005 Posts 452 Senior Member	let us examine each of these statements in how they do not conform with Buddhism: 1. buddha taught suffering is attachment, caused by craving. cancer pain is not attachment. cancer pain is not craving. therefore, how can cancer pain be the dukkha the Buddha ended? If there is no self, there is no place to be in it 2. the mind experiences nibbana. Dear Element, Buddha says that ''attachment is the cause of suffering'' Here bothi indicates that without having any attachment, people are facing with cancer. Or even without having no time yet for an attachment, a baby is born with a birth defect which is a life long suffering. So what dear Element is saying does not conform what bothi is trying to show... With regards,
	Quote