[viagra-kaufen]

personally, i would not take JK too seriously

i have listened to many of JK's audio talks

JK was a monk with Ajahn Chah, returned to the USA, disrobed and embarked upon the simultaneous path of sexual indulgence & meditation guru

this he has communicated in his audio talks

then, i recall, if my memory serves me right, a woman approached JK and advised him his sexual indulgences (promiscuity) did not befit his public profile as a dhamma teacher

then, i recall, if my memory serves me right, that woman became JK's wife

thus, when JK talks of 'the best meditators', 'deep practise', 'enlightenment experiences', etc, i would not take him too seriously

wounds are moral issues to be addressed by developing moral insight & then asserting that moral insight

'the best meditators' develop insight into harmfulness & harmlessness and thus have the means to reconcile past wounds

but JK's early history did not show any profound insight into morality thus he would not have had the means to address wounds

if one is still engaged in behaviour that wounds, such as casual heedless sex, how can one address wounds?

JK is simply marketing himself & his business

kind regards