DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**CVEGK7mV** · 10-30-2011, 07:41 AM

what appears to be your intent, which is to save all sentient beings via supramundane doctrines

Straw Man.

the Pali suttas show the Buddha obviously considered mere morality to be the most suitable form of soteriology for certain audiences As you have said before many times, children and grandmothers. The world has changed.

the Pali suttas also show the Buddha taught a kind of 'Tantra', where faith & love in the Triple Gem served as objects of devotion

for example, if i am not mistaken, in some suttas, the Buddha taught laypeople when they die, they should reflect on the Triple Gem Irrelevant to the topic.

MN 117, without ambiguity, states there are two kinds of right view Yes. One that is mired in the effluents and which consists of superstitions that preceded him, and his own which he identified as being liberative.

thus, Herr Stuka, your views may not actually accord with the Pali suttas That is not the case at all.

instead, your views may be: "the works of poets, elegant in sound, elegant in rhetoric, the work of outsiders, words of disciples" Nice try.

with metta

I am not convinced.

10-30-2011, 07:41 AM	#15
CVEGK7mV Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 459 Senior Member	what appears to be your intent, which is to save all sentient beings via supramundane doctrines Straw Man. the Pali suttas show the Buddha obviously considered mere morality to be the most suitable form of soteriology for certain audiences As you have said before many times, children and grandmothers. The world has changed. the Pali suttas also show the Buddha taught a kind of 'Tantra', where faith & love in the Triple Gem served as objects of devotion for example, if i am not mistaken, in some suttas, the Buddha taught laypeople when they die, they should reflect on the Triple Gem Irrelevant to the topic. MN 117, without ambiguity, states there are two kinds of right view Yes. One that is mired in the effluents and which consists of superstitions that preceded him, and his own which he identified as being liberative. thus, Herr Stuka, your views may not actually accord with the Pali suttas That is not the case at all. instead, your views may be: "the works of poets, elegant in sound, elegant in rhetoric, the work of outsiders, words of disciples" Nice try. with metta I am not convinced.
	Quote