View Single Post
Old 09-23-2011, 10:00 PM   #6
Aafimoq

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
420
Senior Member
Default
From Ajahn Sucitto's "Kamma and the End of Kamma", page iv:


Did the Buddha actually teach this?
No.

Isn't Sucitto just repeating (rebirthing?) the bhikkhu Sati's heresy (MN 38) here? Yes.

What do you think? I think Sucitto should just paint a red dot on his forehead and be done with it...

(Sucitto):

Rebirth and kamma
The agency of samsara is not a body or an identity.
Bodies endure dependent on conditions for one lifetime
only. Identity – as daughter, mother, manager, invalid and
so on – arises dependent on causes and conditions. What is
above referred to as ‘transmigration’ is not ‘rebirth’ but the
process whereby a persisting current of grasping continues
to generate sentient beings. Moreover, this current isn’t
something that only occurs at death, but is continually fed
by kamma in the here and now. Through an inclination
called ‘becoming,’ kamma forms something like a psychological
genetic code. This code, which is the pattern of each
individual’s kammic inheritance, is formed through dynamic
processes called sankhara. Like one’s personal genetic code,
the sankhara retain our kammic blueprints, and so from day
to day we remain the same person in relative terms. "Sankhara" as Atman. I love playing "Find the Atman"....
Aafimoq is offline


 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:09 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity