DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**imporrilk** · 09-13-2011, 12:40 PM

@ Stuka...

Instead of just pointing out that ‘This is Hinduism, and that is also Hinduism’, why not in your own words tell us what should be the correct Buddhist interpretation of these statements then?

The Buddha did not teach that "causation becomes extinct". This is nonsense.
The whole statement should be read in conjunction with the four simple words’ The absolute is reached’, or is it a deliberate way of leaving it out so that you can claim the rest of the statement to be nonsense?

09-13-2011, 12:40 PM	#6
imporrilk Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 461 Senior Member	@ Stuka... Instead of just pointing out that ‘This is Hinduism, and that is also Hinduism’, why not in your own words tell us what should be the correct Buddhist interpretation of these statements then? The Buddha did not teach that "causation becomes extinct". This is nonsense. The whole statement should be read in conjunction with the four simple words’ The absolute is reached’, or is it a deliberate way of leaving it out so that you can claim the rest of the statement to be nonsense?
	Quote