[LsrSRVxR]

Thanks for the link FBM. I'd heard of this debate but never knew anything had survived of it.

I find the wording of the quote odd: rebirth without transmigration. I regard them as synonymous. If there is nothing transmigrating, then there is nothing to be reborn.

If we regard our condition as entirely dependent arisen, then how can that which is not established (ie self) within our own aggregates be claimed to be 'passed over' to the dependent arisen aggregates of another?

And if this is not being claimed, what then is being claimed?

Still don't get it.