DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**k5wTvu9f** · 07-31-2011, 02:28 PM

Nagasena. And HHDL.

Oh. I guess I'm reading the Milinda Panha differently. It looks to me that Nagasena was explicitly denying a transmigrating spiritual substance/atman. If you don't mind, have time and are interested, would you mind pointing me to which passage(s) strike you as trying to slip it in? In the meantime, I'd probably better give it a re-read. It's been a while since I read it through.

07-31-2011, 02:28 PM	#27
k5wTvu9f Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 522 Senior Member	Nagasena. And HHDL. Oh. I guess I'm reading the Milinda Panha differently. It looks to me that Nagasena was explicitly denying a transmigrating spiritual substance/atman. If you don't mind, have time and are interested, would you mind pointing me to which passage(s) strike you as trying to slip it in? In the meantime, I'd probably better give it a re-read. It's been a while since I read it through.
	Quote