[lzwha]

I just meant that the various traditions define "dhamma" somewhat differently, and thus they will have different ideas about what constitutes "adhamma" (not-dhamma). The list gave examples of the points of divergence.

Again, why bother calling oneself "Buddhist", if the teachings of the Buddha are of no consequence? Might as well just admit being a "something-else-ist" -- whatever that "something else" may be -- and be done with it.